The evidence provides conflicting and non-specific information regarding stock market movements around specific dates (e.g., mentions of 2025, 2026, or general rallies/slumps). The claim specifies a start date of 'Feb. 28 start of the war with Iran' and a specific pattern (zigzagging, dropping, rebounding to all-time highs last week). The search results mention market activity but do not confirm this precise sequence tied to the specified geopolitical event or timeframe.

The web search results provide general information about gender differences in views (e.g., liberalism vs. capitalism) but do not contain any research directly stating that women are more likely to adopt a long-term, buy-and-hold investing strategy compared to men during market volatility.

The evidence provides general information about McKinsey & Company, but none of the retrieved web search results or Wikipedia entries mention a specific '2025 study' by McKinsey & Co. regarding women preferring stable investments or adopting a cautious approach. The evidence is insufficient to confirm this specific claim, although McKinsey is a known entity.

The evidence points to Fidelity's 'Women Talk Money' resources and mentions economic uncertainty, but none of the retrieved web search results or Wikipedia entries confirm the specific statistic: that '42% of women cut down non-essential spending in the past year' based on a '2025 Women & Money study by Fidelity.' This specific data point could not be verified.

The evidence contains general financial accounting questions dated around 2020 (e.g., Chegg results), but none of the retrieved web search results or Wikipedia entries mention the specific 2020 McKinsey research report predicting that by 2030, women would hold two-thirds of the private wealth in the U.S. This specific prediction could not be verified.