The web search results discuss the topic of a referendum and gerrymandering in Virginia, suggesting the claim's premise is covered by the search results. However, no specific, independent sources confirm the exact details: that Virginians *will* vote on an 'aggressive gerrymandering proposal' on a specific 'Tuesday' with the stated goal of netting four seats. The evidence is suggestive but lacks the required corroboration for a higher verdict.

The web search results discuss the concept of a referendum and the context of Virginia redistricting, but none of the provided evidence explicitly states the expected shift from a '6 to 5 Democrat to Republican breakdown in Congress' to a '10 to 1 split for the Virginia delegation.' This specific numerical prediction is only present in the claim itself and is not corroborated by multiple independent sources.

The web search results contain a snippet stating, 'In other words, Democrats would be very likely, but not guaranteed to control 91% of Virginia's congressional seats in a state where former Vice President Kamala Harris won with just under 52%...' This specific combination of percentages and predictions is only found within the search results related to the claim and is not independently corroborated by multiple sources.

The web search results contain a statement matching the claim's description: 'The referendum would impose the expected 10-to-1 split maps until the 2030 redistricting cycle, when it will allow apportionment to revert to the traditional system.' However, this specific combination of details is only present in the search results and is not corroborated by multiple independent sources.