UN designates slave trade as ‘gravest crime against humanity’ despite US opposition
Analysis Summary
- Propaganda Score
- 50% (confidence: 70%)
- Summary
- The UN General Assembly designated the transatlantic African slave trade as 'the gravest crime against humanity,' a resolution opposed by the U.S., Israel, and Argentina. Advocates frame it as a step toward reparations and healing, while critics argue it improperly ranks historical crimes and disregards international law.
Topics
Detected Techniques
Whataboutism
(confidence: 80%)
Deflecting criticism by pointing to a different issue.
Smears
(confidence: 60%)
Using damaging allegations to undermine a person's reputation.
Fact-Check Results
“UN designates slave trade as ‘gravest crime against humanity’ despite US opposition”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to confirm or refute the UN's designation of slave trade as 'gravest crime against humanity'
“The United States, Israel and Argentina opposed the measure while Britain and EU member states abstained”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to verify voting patterns of specific countries on the resolution
“In a move advocates hailed as a step towards healing and possible reparations, the resolution was adopted to applause by a vote of 123 in favour, three against and 52 abstentions”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to confirm the vote tally or adoption process of the resolution
“Ghana's President John Mahama, one of the African Union's most vocal supporters of slavery reparations, was at the United Nations headquarters in New York to support the vote”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to verify Ghana's President Mahama's involvement or statements
“Despite being non-binding, the resolution goes beyond simple acknowledgement and asks nations involved in the slave trade to engage in restorative justice”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to confirm the resolution's content or binding nature
“It also highlights the legacy of slavery via 'the persistence of racial discrimination and neo-colonialism' in today's society”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to verify the resolution's specific wording about legacy issues
“The United States called the text 'highly problematic'”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to confirm the US's official stance on the resolution
“The United States also does not recognise a legal right to reparations for historical wrongs that were not illegal under international law at the time they occurred”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to verify the US position on reparations legality
“The United States also strongly objects to the resolution's attempt to rank crimes against humanity in any type of hierarchy”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to confirm the US objection to ranking crimes against humanity
“Britain and EU countries advanced similar arguments while acknowledging the wrongs of slavery”
❓
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
— No evidence found in archive to verify Britain/EU's arguments on the resolution
“The resolution 'risks pitting historical tragedies against each other that should not be compared, except at the expense of the memory of the victims'”
❓
PENDING
“He also suggested that institutions continue to address structural racism and that 'compensation' could be offered to those affected”
❓
PENDING
“One pathway toward restorative justice, he said, is that 'all the looted artefacts are returned to the motherland'”
❓
PENDING
“Ghanaian Foreign Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa on Tuesday dismissed criticism that the text sought to rank human suffering”
❓
PENDING
“He also alleged that some nations had refused to acknowledge their crimes”
❓
PENDING
“The perpetrators of the transatlantic slave trade are known: the Europeans, the United States of America. We expect all of them to formally apologise to Africa and to all people of African descent”
❓
PENDING