The web search results mention driver injuries (e.g., 'leaving the truck driver in critical condition' or 'Driver treated for burns'), but none of the provided evidence explicitly and consistently state that *only* the driver was hospitalized with burns and that *no one else* was injured. The evidence is suggestive but lacks corroboration for the 'no one else was injured' part.

Two web search results mention the time firefighters left the scene (one mentions '7 a.m.' and another mentions '7:30 p.m.' or '8:30 p.m.'), but there is no corroboration from a second independent source confirming the 7 a.m. departure time for this specific incident.

Two web search results mention the timing of the fire ignition (one mentions 'shortly after 1 a.m.' and another mentions 'around 1:30 a.m. Monday'), but the evidence is not consistently reported by multiple independent sources for this specific event. The other web search results discuss different fire causes and locations.

The web search results provide evidence that the driver was attempting to prevent the gas from spilling into the Valero gas station parking lot, but this specific detail is only clearly reported in the context of the initial web search results and lacks corroboration from a second independent source.

While the claim describes a general event (18-wheeler collision in Texas leading to fire), the provided evidence for this index is highly mixed. Some web results describe train/18-wheeler collisions, while others are irrelevant (Ella Langley song, general Texas info). The specific details of 'Sunday' and the sequence are not consistently corroborated across independent sources for the same event. The evidence is too disparate to confirm the specific claim.