eFinder

eFinder

Home › Article

Study: Younger scientists produce more disruptive research | The Jerusalem Post

Jpost · · 651 words · By JERUSALEM POST STAFF
open_in_new Read the original article: https://www.jpost.com/science/article-896023

fact_checkFact-Check Results

9 claims extracted and verified against multiple sources including cross-references, web search, and Wikipedia.

info Single Source 6
check_circle Corroborated 1
verified Verified By Reference 1
help Insufficient Evidence 1
info
“A sweeping analysis of 12.5 million researchers from 1960 to 2020 finds that scientists are most likely to produce “disruptive” work early in their careers.”
SINGLE SOURCE
One web search result from Nature (via University of Pittsburgh) confirms the analysis of 12.5 million researchers over 60 years and the finding that early-career researchers are more likely to produce disruptive science. Other provided results are irrelevant.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Experienced researchers are less likely to produce ‘disruptive’ science than are those just starting their careers, finds an analysis of the scientific papers published by 12.5 million researchers ove…
https://sciencesprings.wordpress.com/2026/05/12/from-nature-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — In this study, led by the University of Glasgow, scientists analysed the brains of 23 amateur and eight professional rugby players which had been donated for medical research. With an average playing …
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-67192693
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — A study in 2018 found that wearing a necktie can reduce the blood flow to your brain by up to 7.5 per cent, which can make you feel dizzy, nauseous and cause headaches. They can also increase the pres…
https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/fun-facts
info
“The study, published in Science, identifies a “nostalgia effect” in which researchers grow less receptive to new developments over time and more inclined to consolidate existing knowledge.”
SINGLE SOURCE
The provided evidence for this claim consists of a general Wikipedia page on nostalgia and unrelated Science journal snippets. There is no specific evidence provided that confirms the 'nostalgia effect' as described in the claim.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The more serious threats a group faces, the tighter its norms will be.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1197754
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — study published in the journal Psychological Science.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09567976221105460
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The scientific literature on nostalgia usually refers to nostalgia regarding one's personal life and has mainly studied the effects of nostalgia as induced during these studies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostalgia
info
“For every additional year of a scientist’s academic age, the average age of the papers they cite increases by about one month.”
SINGLE SOURCE
One web search result mentions research showing scientific innovation narrows as scientists age and discusses 'average reference age' in relation to 'academic age', but the specific 'one month per year' metric is not explicitly detailed in the snippet provided, though the general premise is supported by one source.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — They defined academic age as the number of years since a scientist’s first publication, and followed how their primary knowledge sources, captured by average reference age, changed over time.
https://datascience.uchicago.edu/insights/new-research-shows…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Check out Cite This For Me™ Premium. A good paper references several sources. Multiply that with the several papers most schools assign in a year, and you get dozens of sources that will need to be ci…
https://www.citethisforme.com/
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Generate APA citations in seconds. Start citing books, websites, journals, and more with the Citation Machine® APA Citation Generator.
https://www.citationmachine.net/apa
info
“The researchers measure disruption by how later studies cite a focal paper. If subsequent work cites the focal paper without also citing its references, the focal paper’s ideas appear to displace earlier foundations.”
SINGLE SOURCE
The evidence provided for this claim consists of stock market data for Microsoft, which is completely irrelevant to the definition of scientific disruption.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Microsoft Corporation is an American multinational technology conglomerate headquartered in Redmond, Washington. The company became influential in the rise of personal computers through software ...
https://www.google.com/finance/beta/quote/MSFT:NASDAQ
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Apr 16, 2026 · Consulte los datos de las acciones de Microsoft con ticker MSFT antes de la sesión de mercado o evalúe su cotización fuera de horario.
https://es.investing.com/equities/microsoft-corp
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Oct 21, 2025 · Consulta las últimas cotizaciones de acciones, historial, noticias y otra información esencial de Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) para ayudarte con tus operaciones bursátiles e inversiones…
https://es.finance.yahoo.com/quote/MSFT/
check_circle
“Raiyan Abdul Baten, a computational social scientist at the University of South Florida, suggests that researchers tend to cite papers published about two years before their own first paper... according to Nature.”
CORROBORATED
Two independent sources confirm the details: one Nature-related snippet confirms the finding that the most cited paper is typically published two years before the first paper, and another source confirms Raiyan Abdul Baten's identity and affiliation with the University of South Florida.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The researchers also found that the paper a scientist cites most often during their career is typically published about two years before they publish their own first paper. This suggests that “as you …
https://sciencesprings.wordpress.com/2026/05/12/from-nature-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Raiyan Abdul Baten. About. Research. Publications. CV.I am an Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering at the University of South Florida. I build technology for soft-skills development…
https://www.raiyan-ab.com/
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Raiyan Abdul Baten received his PhD and MS degrees from the University of Rochester and a BSc from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.
https://www.usf.edu/ai-cybersecurity-computing/people/facult…
verified
“The study places this in historical context with examples such as Albert Einstein, who spent the latter part of his career opposing quantum mechanics.”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
Wikipedia and other sources confirm Einstein's later career was spent searching for a unified field theory and that he had a complex, often opposing relationship with certain developments in quantum mechanics (e.g., the EPR paradox and his general skepticism of its completeness).
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — In the middle part of his career, Einstein made important contributions to statistical mechanics and quantum theory. Especially notable was his work on the quantum physics of radiation, in which light…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — TFA also refers to just Einstein's 1905 papers. He published general relativity 10 years later. And after GE he contributed e.g. stimulated emission, Bose-Einstein statistics, Einstein-de Sitter cosmo…
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48114795
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Einstein spent the latter part of his life searching for such a unified field theory, but was unsuccessful.The field of quantum electrodynamics, in the 1940s, successfully translated Maxwell's electro…
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-unified-field-theory-26993…
info
“A comparison of preprints with their later published versions shows citation patterns shifting toward older references after formal review.”
SINGLE SOURCE
The evidence provided defines preprints and peer review in general terms but does not provide any data or findings regarding citation patterns shifting toward older references after review.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — In academic publishing, a preprint is a version of a scholarly or scientific paper that precedes formal peer review and publication in a peer-reviewed scholarly or scientific journal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preprint
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Open peer review refers to the process of making peer reviewer reports openly available.
https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-science/about/the-fun…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Peer review has been a formal part of scientific communication since the first scientific journals appeared more than 300 years ago. The Philosophical Transactions. of the Royal Society is thought to …
https://www.elsevier.com/reviewer/what-is-peer-review
info
“The end of mandatory retirement in the United States in 1994 is cited as an example of how institutional changes can alter the age structure of the scientific workforce”
SINGLE SOURCE
The evidence provided consists of dictionary definitions for the word 'mandatory' and does not mention the 1994 end of mandatory retirement in the US.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — 必应词典为您提供mandatory的释义，美 [ˈmændəˌtɔri]，英 [ˈmændət (ə)ri]，adj. 强制的；法定的；义务的； n. 同“mandatary”； 网络释义： 命令的；强制性的；强迫的；
https://global.bing.com/dict/search?q=mandatory&FORM=BDVSP6&…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The procedures for ensuring standards are both mandatory (regulation and inspection) and voluntary (quality assurance).
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/zhs/词典/英语-汉语-简体/mandatory
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — 爱词霸权威在线词典,为您提供mandatory的中文意思,mandatory的用法讲解,mandatory的读音,mandatory的同义词,mandatory的反义词,mandatory的例句等英语服务。
https://www.iciba.com/word?w=mandatory
help
“International comparisons suggest that countries with younger scientific communities tend to produce more disruptive research.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence was provided for this claim.
info Disclaimer: This analysis is generated by AI and should be used as a starting point for critical thinking, not as definitive truth. Claims are verified against publicly available sources. Always consult the original article and additional sources for complete context.