The provided web search results mention Saba Capital launching tender offers for Blue Owl BDCs, but none of the snippets directly quote or confirm the specific statement that the offers came in 'below initial expectations.' The evidence is focused on the *launch* of the offers, not the outcome relative to expectations.

The web search results provide general information about Saba Capital and Blue Owl, and one snippet mentions a 35% discount related to a tender offer for OBDC II. However, the evidence is not sufficient to confirm the specific timing ('early March') or the exact nature of the liquidity offering as described in the claim, as the search results are general or lack the necessary context.

The web search results do not contain the specific detail that Saba acquired '$10 million in aggregate face value across 190 separate trades, substantially all from SREIT.' The evidence is too general to confirm this precise transactional summary.

The evidence does not contain the specific report that the tender for Blue Owl shares failed to garner more than 1% of what was offered. The web search results discuss Blue Owl's stock and asset management but lack this specific failure metric.

The web search results provide general context about Blue Owl's activities and redemptions, but none of the snippets specifically confirm the sequence of events: halting quarterly redemptions in OBDC II *in mid-February* and opting to return capital via asset sales.