While the claim suggests decentralization of powers, the provided evidence is general regarding the amendments and does not contain specific, corroborating details about decentralizing administrative powers to heads of departments. The claim appears to be drawn from a specific source not independently verified by the search results.

The provided evidence is entirely focused on the Zondo Commission and its findings (Claim 3). There are no web search results or Wikipedia entries that discuss the balance of blame between executives, systemic issues, and the role of boards, making independent corroboration impossible.

The evidence confirms the existence of the National School of Government and the general need for public administration guidance. However, there is no independent evidence from multiple sources confirming that *new* regulations *must* be crafted collaboratively by the public service and administration department, the National School of Government, and the National Treasury.

The web search results discuss the need for municipalities to enforce laws and governance codes for municipal entities, suggesting a need for clear boundaries. However, there is no independent corroboration or specific reference to the need to delineate clear boundaries governing board conduct within government departments, SOEs, public entities, and municipal-owned entities across multiple sources.