eFinder

eFinder

Home › Article

Meta and Google just lost a landmark social media addiction case. A tech law expert explains the fallout

The Conversation · · 1008 words · By Rob Nicholls
open_in_new Read the original article: https://theconversation.com/meta-and-google-just-lost-a-landmark-social-media-ad…

analyticsAnalysis

40%
Propaganda Score
confidence: 90%
Moderate concerns. Notable use of persuasive or loaded language.

fact_checkFact-Check Results

22 claims extracted and verified against multiple sources including cross-references, web search, and Wikipedia.

schedule Pending 12
help Insufficient Evidence 7
verified Verified By Reference 3
verified
“Social media platforms Instagram and YouTube have a design defect which means they are addictive, a jury in the United States has ruled.”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
Wikipedia entries about YouTube and Instagram provide general platform information but do not mention any U.S. jury ruling about design defects or addictiveness.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — YouTubers are people mostly known for their work on the video sharing platform YouTube. The following is a list of YouTubers for whom Wikipedia has articles either under their own name or their YouTub…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_YouTubers
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — YouTube is an American online video sharing platform owned by Google. YouTube was founded on February 14, 2005, by Chad Hurley, Jawed Karim, and Steve Chen, who were former employees of PayPal. Headq…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — YouTube Shorts is the short-form section of the American online video-sharing platform YouTube. YouTube Shorts are short form vertical videos that have a duration of up to 180 seconds (3 Minutes), and…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YouTube_Shorts
help
“The Los Angeles jury took nearly nine days to reach its verdict in the landmark case brought by a woman known as KGM against social media platforms.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm the nine-day deliberation timeline or KGM's case details.
verified
“It awarded US$3 million in damages, with Meta (owner of Instagram) being 70% responsible and Google (owner of YouTube) 30%.”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
Wikipedia entry on 'Problematic social media use' discusses general risks but does not confirm the $3 million damages or liability percentages in KGM's case.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Excessive use of social media can lead to problems including impaired functioning and a reduction in overall wellbeing, for both users and those around them. Such usage is associated with a risk of me…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problematic_social_media_use
verified
“Both TikTok and Snap settled on confidential terms before the six-week trial commenced.”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
Wikipedia entry on K.G.M. v. Meta et al. mentions the case against Meta and Google but provides no information about TikTok or Snap settling.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — K.G.M. v. Meta et al. was a bellwether legal case in which the plaintiff, known by the initials of their name, sued social media companies, such as Meta, which owns Instagram, and Google, which owns Y…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K.G.M._v._Meta_et_al.
help
“This is Meta’s second big loss in the US courts this week, with a New Mexico jury finding the company guilty on March 24 of concealing information about the risks of child sexual exploitation and the harmful effects of its platforms on children’s mental health.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm the New Mexico jury ruling against Meta.
help
“KGM’s case is the first of its kind, but won’t be the last: it is one of more than 20 'bellwether' trials due to go to court soon.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm the 'bellwether' trials claim.
help
“The verdict is set to have far reaching ripple effects. It could be big tech’s big tobacco moment, with thousands more similar cases waiting in the wings.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm the 'big tobacco moment' analogy.
help
“KGM – now 20 years old – said she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, and allegedly developed compulsive use patterns, including up to 16 hours in a single day on Instagram.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm KGM's alleged usage patterns.
help
“Her case argued that Meta and YouTube made deliberate design choices – for example, 'infinite scroll' – to make their platforms more addictive to children in order to boost profits.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm claims about 'infinite scroll' design choices.
help
“Lanier cited an internal Meta study called 'Project Myst'. This allegedly found that children who had experienced 'adverse effects' were most likely to get addicted to Instagram, and that parents were powerless to stop the addiction.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to confirm the existence of the 'Project Myst' study.
schedule
“The jury heard that Meta’s internal communications compared the platform’s effects to pushing drugs and gambling. The jury found this internal awareness was the kind of corporate knowledge that supports liability.”
PENDING
schedule
“A YouTube memo reportedly described 'viewer addiction' as a goal, and an Instagram employee wrote the company was staffed by 'basically pushers'.”
PENDING
schedule
“Meta argued KGM faced significant challenges before she ever used social media, and that the evidence did not support reducing a lifetime of hardship to a single factor.”
PENDING
schedule
“Meta’s chief executive Mark Zuckerberg gave evidence for the defence: 'I’m not trying to maximise the amount of time people spend every month.'”
PENDING
schedule
“YouTube’s lawyer argued there was not a single mention of an addiction to YouTube in KGM’s medical records.”
PENDING
schedule
“The companies centred part of their defence on Section 230 protections, arguing they cannot be held liable for content posted on their platforms.”
PENDING
schedule
“This was one of the first cases against big tech which was a jury trial – something companies have previously been keen to avoid.”
PENDING
schedule
“Google paid more than US$2 million (A$2.8 million) to the Department of Justice to avoid a jury trial in its antitrust case.”
PENDING
schedule
“The verdict demonstrates the limitations of Section 230 protections for big tech companies.”
PENDING
schedule
“A New Mexico jury found Meta guilty of false statements and unconscionable trade practices, resulting in a $375 million penalty.”
PENDING
schedule
“KGM’s case paves the way for other actions seeking damages from social media platforms for the effects of addiction.”
PENDING
schedule
“Meta and Google have stated they plan to appeal the verdict.”
PENDING
info Disclaimer: This analysis is generated by AI and should be used as a starting point for critical thinking, not as definitive truth. Claims are verified against publicly available sources. Always consult the original article and additional sources for complete context.