eFinder

eFinder

Medicinal cannabis has gone mainstream. But Australia’s struggling to cope

Analysis Summary

Propaganda Score
25% (confidence: 95%)

Fact-Check Results

“Medicinal cannabis has become a routine part of health care in Australia far more quickly than many expected.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to confirm or refute the claim about medicinal cannabis being routine in Australian healthcare.
“What began in 2016 as a tightly controlled pathway for patients with complex conditions that had not responded to other treatments has grown into a large, mainstream prescribing market.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to verify the timeline or scope of medicinal cannabis prescribing in Australia.
“Publicly available Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) data I analysed shows close to one million approvals for medicinal cannabis in Australia.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to confirm or dispute the TGA data claims about medicinal cannabis approvals.
“Doctors told us as far back as 2018 (in research published in 2021) of their concerns about medicinal cannabis prescribing.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to support or contradict doctors' concerns about medicinal cannabis prescribing in 2018.
“Over time, publicly available TGA data I analysed shows a shift in the type of medicinal cannabis prescribed.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to verify shifts in medicinal cannabis prescription types according to TGA data.
“Approvals for THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) dominant products are also rising, according to publicly available TGA data I’ve analysed.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to confirm or dispute rising THC-dominant product approvals based on TGA data.
“When medicines, including the less-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD) products, are prescribed by someone other than a person’s usual doctor, it is often unclear who is responsible for monitoring any harm.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to support or refute claims about responsibility gaps in non-usual doctor prescriptions.
“Many others have written about the limited, robust evidence for whether medicinal cannabis works for a range of conditions, including for anxiety, pain and sleep.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to verify claims about limited evidence for medicinal cannabis efficacy.
“Patients prescribed medicinal cannabis increasingly turn to social media, online forums and internet searches to share experiences, compare products, discuss dosing strategies, and interpret side-effects.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to confirm or dispute patient behavior regarding social media and medicinal cannabis.
“The federal government has announced reforms requiring medicines prescribed online or via telehealth to be visible in My Health Record, alongside any clinical context.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE — No evidence found in archive to verify federal reforms about My Health Record visibility for telehealth prescriptions.