The evidence provides general information about Jeremy Bentham's views on utility and law (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, IEoP), but none of the provided web search results explicitly state the claim that he believed humans could apply law scientifically using codified principles, facts, and evidence through pure logic and reason. The claim is a specific synthesis of his philosophy that is not directly confirmed by the provided snippets.

The web search results confirm that Chad M. Oldfather wrote a book titled *Judges, Judging, and Judgment* and that the book discusses issues facing the judiciary. However, none of the provided evidence snippets quote or confirm the specific passage: 'Judges likewise tend to imagine that they outperform their colleagues in terms of their abilities to evaluate witness credibility and to avoid racial or gender prejudice. Judges, like everyone else, tend to wear rose-coloured glasses when looking in the mirror. We should not be surprised to hear them tell us that their decisions are simply a product of the law, even if it may appear to us that they are a product of something else entirely.' The evidence only confirms the book's existence and general themes, not the specific quote.