The claim specifies 'Monday' and 'nearly five months after the deadly blaze' for the return of 'About 270 residents' from Wang Fuk Court. While multiple sources confirm residents are returning to collect belongings after the fire, they do not corroborate the specific date ('Monday') or the precise number of residents (270) returning on that specific day.

The claim attributes the statement regarding '269 residents from 78 households' returning in 'two phases' specifically to Warner Cheuk Wing-hing. While multiple sources confirm Cheuk Wing-hing made statements about phased returns for Wang Fuk Court residents, the specific figures (269 residents, 78 households) are not corroborated by multiple independent sources provided.

The claim quotes Cheuk stating residents can visit multiple times if conditions allow, especially for those on lower floors. This detail appears in the web search results, but the exact phrasing and the specific context of 'lower floors might be able to make multiple trips' are not confirmed by multiple independent sources.

The claim specifies a limit of 'four registered visitors' for 'up to three hours, excluding stair time.' This detail is reported in the web search results, but no other independent source corroborates this precise limitation.

The claim states Cheuk said residents could make multiple trips within the three-hour period following appeals. This aligns with the general theme in the web search results regarding flexibility, but the specific statement about multiple trips *within* the three-hour period is not corroborated by multiple independent sources.

The claim reports that Cheuk did not comment on restrictions but stated visiting three times was reasonable. This reflects the nuanced discussion in the web search results, but the specific combination of 'did not comment on restrictions' AND 'visiting three times was reasonable' is not confirmed by multiple independent sources.