The evidence provided only contains web search results discussing the general context of the Haredi draft and legal rulings, but none of the retrieved snippets directly confirm the specific claim that the current debate *incorrectly assumes* that military warnings and court rulings are sufficient to resolve the issue. This appears to be a nuanced argument from the source material that is not independently corroborated.

The evidence provided includes dictionary definitions for 'burden' but lacks direct, corroborating news reports that synthesize the specific argument that 'the burden is unequal, the old exemption model is unsustainable, and the nation cannot sustain the current service gap during wartime.' This appears to be a summary argument from the original source material.

The evidence provided includes dictionary definitions for 'implementing' but lacks direct, corroborating news reports that confirm the specific judgment that 'Implementing a harsher enforcement regime may yield limited enlistment but is not wise.' This appears to be a conclusion drawn in the source material.

The evidence provides general definitions of 'coercion' (Wikipedia, Merriam-Webster, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) but does not contain independent news reports that confirm the specific mechanism described: that coercion creates the *appearance* of success by forcing minor enlistments while discouraging larger voluntary numbers.