Multiple web search results report that Judge James Boasberg was criticized for rulings on national immigration policy and that his authority was questioned by other judges or the appeals court. The claim's specific framing ('comeuppance,' 'obsessive anti-Trump') is editorial, but the core factual elements—Boasberg's rulings on immigration policy and subsequent judicial scrutiny—are reported across multiple web sources.

Multiple web search results reference Judge James E. Boasberg issuing orders regarding the temporary blocking of deportations, including mentions of El Salvador and Honduras, supporting the core claim that he issued such an order in March 2025.

Multiple web search results report that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Judge James Boasberg overstepped his authority or abused his discretion regarding his contempt probe, aligning with the claim's core assertion.

Multiple web search results report that Milwaukee County Judge Hannah Dugan was accused of, indicted for, and found guilty of obstructing federal agents while helping an undocumented immigrant evade ICE arrest, matching the core details of the claim.

Multiple web search results confirm that Judge Hannah Dugan was found guilty of felony obstruction related to helping an undocumented immigrant evade federal agents, matching the key outcomes described in the claim.

Multiple web search results reference a Supreme Court case, *Trump v. CASA*, occurring in June 2025, where the Court ruled on the authority of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions, directly corroborating the main facts of the claim.