The provided evidence only contains general Wikipedia entries for 'Upper East Side' and 'Upper West Side' neighborhoods, which confirm the existence and boundaries of the UWS. However, none of the web search results or Wikipedia entries report on current opposition or fighting against a specific bike lane plan on the Upper West Side. Therefore, while the location is confirmed, the claim of active opposition is unsupported by the gathered evidence.

The evidence provided contains general Wikipedia entries for 'Bike lane' and 'Delancey Street,' but no specific information regarding the 'No 72nd Street Bike Lane Coalition,' the collection of 1,000 signatures, or plans for a rally/picket at West 72nd Street and Broadway. The claim relies on details not present in the gathered evidence.

The web search results confirm that Community Board 7 (CB7) has held meetings and that community backlash has influenced redesign plans (e.g., 'CB7 Approves Revised River Run Plan After Community Pushback'). However, none of the gathered evidence specifically state that CB7 postponed a meeting on the proposed redesign until June due to community backlash. The timing and specific reason for postponement are not corroborated.

The evidence provided contains general information about the name 'Darryl' but no mention of a coalition member named Darryl Dornfeld, nor any statements attributed to him regarding local residents demanding more input or not being anti-cyclist. The claim's specific details are not supported by the evidence.

One web search result mentions that a redesigned corridor serves multiple bus routes (e.g., 'The redesigned Livingston Street corridor serves four bus routes, the B41, B45, B67, and B103...'). This supports the idea that the corridor serves bus routes. However, the evidence does not corroborate the specific argument that the redesign disrupts a corridor that *also* contains a major subway hub and sees heavy delivery traffic, making the claim too broad and lacking multiple sources.

The evidence does not contain any specific web search results or Wikipedia entries detailing the coalition's warning about removing one car travel lane in each direction causing congestion and worsening air quality. The claim's specific details are not supported by the evidence.

The web search results confirm that Lester Wasserman's business relies on deliveries and curb-side access (e.g., 'Owner Lester Wasserman said his business gets Fedex and UPS deliveries lasting 40 to 60 minutes apiece...'). This supports the core concern about disruption. However, the evidence does not explicitly state that the protected bike lane would disrupt the use of pallet jacks for unloading tons of merchandise, making the specific mechanism of disruption a single-source claim.