While the evidence confirms that the SNS tightened its grip on the media and that there were protests regarding the public broadcaster's management and editors, the specific claim that the *entire* management, editors, and presenters were replaced is only strongly suggested by the context of the web search results, and not independently corroborated by multiple sources.

The claim attributes the statement to 'Sejdinovic.' While the web search results discuss the funding of pro-government media, the specific quote or statement attributed to Sejdinovic is not found in the provided evidence, making the claim uncorroborated by the evidence provided.

The evidence confirms that 'project co-financing' is a method where public funds are allocated to media outlets through competitive calls to support public interest content. This specific mechanism is reported in the web search results, but no second independent source confirms this mechanism.

The web search results provide the exact description of the first funding channel (project co-financing) and the context of public funding for media. However, the specific financial figures (€120 million / $140 million) and the attribution to BIRN and the Center for Sustainable Communities are not present in the provided evidence, making the specific quantification uncorroborated.

The web search results discuss the general theme of maintaining good PR and avoiding advertising, but they do not independently confirm the specific claim that private companies are avoiding advertising in independent media *specifically* to maintain good relations with the authorities in Serbia. The evidence is too general.