The claim describes the sequence of events (yelling, racking the gun, single shot) based on a patron's video, but the evidence provided for this claim (index 5) is about the Patterson-Gimlin film, not the shooting incident. The web search results for index 5 are about the Patterson-Gimlin film, not the shooting incident. Therefore, the evidence provided for this index is irrelevant to the claim.

The claim describes Patterson following a victim outside and firing an additional round that hit a window. While web search results mention Patterson firing shots and the incident escalating outside, the specific detail of 'following and firing an additional round that missed the victim but hit a restaurant window' is not corroborated by multiple independent sources, and the evidence provided is not specific enough to confirm this detail.

The claim states Patterson told 911 that a customer jumped behind the register. While the web search results mention police reports and statements, the specific detail that Patterson told 911 that a customer jumped behind the register is not corroborated by multiple independent sources. The provided Wikipedia evidence is irrelevant to the shooting incident.