The claim details a specific sequence of events (failure to appear, postponement) related to the Buffalo City Metro. While web search results confirm Princess Faku's role as mayor and the existence of MPAC, none of the provided live sources independently corroborate the specific sequence of events, the failure to appear, or the resulting postponement of the special council meeting.

The claim describes the meeting being postponed for Thursday due to an outstanding report. The web search results provide general information about meeting postponements and MPAC, but none independently confirm the specific details of this particular postponement or the outstanding report central to the day's agenda.

The claim attributes the postponement to Council chief whip Sangweni Matwele citing the absence of compliance reports. Web search results mention Sangweni Matwele's potential return as chief whip and general MPAC postponements, but none independently corroborate the specific instance of him moving for the postponement citing these reports.

The claim states that councillors across parties said the delay was due to Faku's failure to attend Mpac public hearings. While the evidence confirms Faku's role and the existence of MPAC, and that delays occurred, no independent source corroborates the specific reason cited by multiple councillors regarding her failure to attend hearings.

The claim quotes the Mpac report stating the executive mayor did not attend engagement sessions despite submitting written responses. While the evidence confirms the existence and purpose of MPAC reports, and that reports raise concerns, no independent source provides this specific quote or finding regarding the mayor's attendance.

The claim quotes the Mpac report regarding the negative impact on oversight and undermining Mpac's authority. Similar to claim 4, while the evidence confirms MPAC's role in oversight and reporting, no independent source provides this specific, detailed quote or finding.

The claim describes a previous version of the Mpac report from March being rejected as incomplete. The evidence confirms MPAC's role and the potential for report revisions, but no independent source corroborates the specific details of a March report rejection due to lack of input from the mayor's office and BCM Development Agency.

The claim states that MPAC was instructed to hold public hearings with the mayor and resubmit a final report. While the evidence confirms MPAC's function and the need for public consultations, no independent source confirms this specific instruction or directive.