The web search results mention that renewable generation reached a high level on record and that the renewable share increased, but they do not independently corroborate the specific figures (above 90% renewable, record low emissions) across multiple distinct sources. The evidence points to high renewable levels but lacks the necessary cross-source confirmation for the precise claim.

One web search result explicitly states that 'Oil now comprises its highest quarterly share of New Zealand’s overall energy emissions on record,' but no other independent sources corroborate this specific claim.

While multiple web search results discuss the composition of New Zealand's energy emissions from different sectors (transport, manufacturing, electricity), none of the provided evidence sources contain the specific breakdown percentages (77% from oil, 12% from gas, 6% from coal, 5% from electricity generation) to corroborate the claim.

Two web search results discuss New Zealand's vulnerability to oil price shocks and the need to reduce dependence, suggesting this failure has occurred, but they do not independently corroborate the specific claim that the country 'failed to mitigate such strategic vulnerability' during *two* prior periods of high oil prices.

The web search results contain a list of oil consumption data spanning 1980 to 2006, but they do not contain specific historical data points or analysis confirming that New Zealand's consumption did not return to pre-1978 levels until 1990. The evidence is too general to confirm the specific timeline.

The evidence provided for this claim consists only of general Wikipedia entries about New Zealand's economy and geography, which do not contain the specific historical data points needed to confirm that oil consumption did not recover to pre-2008 levels until 2015.