The provided evidence includes Wikipedia entries mentioning Miguel Díaz-Canel, but none of the snippets directly quote or confirm the specific statement that he said the US has no valid reason to attack Cuba or attempt to depose him. The evidence is insufficient to corroborate this specific claim across multiple independent sources.

The evidence provides general context regarding US-Cuba relations (e.g., 'Modern diplomatic relations between Cuba and the United States are cold...'), but it does not contain specific information confirming that tensions remain high *despite* both sides acknowledging talks without sharing details, as claimed.

The evidence provides general information about Díaz-Canel and the political situation in Cuba, but it does not contain the specific quotes or details regarding him accusing the US of a 'hostile policy' or stating the US has no moral standing to demand things from Cuba. This specific content is not verifiable from the provided snippets.

The evidence mentions an 'oil shortage and economic crisis is taking place in Cuba, caused by an American fuel blockade,' which supports the general premise of the claim. However, it does not provide the detailed breakdown—that the lack of fuel specifically affects the health system, public transport, *and* production of goods and services—as stated in the claim, nor is this detailed claim corroborated by multiple sources.