Could a solar storm derail the Artemis II mission?

The Conversation · 🇦🇺 public Australia · Apr 01, 2026 · 1135 words · By Clive Dyer

headphones Listen to the eFinder podcast briefing

Generate a natural audio summary of this story

Daily briefing

What to know about Could a solar storm derail the Artemis II mission?

The article discusses solar radiation risks for astronauts during deep space missions, referencing historical events like the 1972 solar particle event and current research efforts. It explains how solar cycles affect radiation exposure and mentions NASA's and the University of Surrey's work on mitigating these risks.

Propaganda risk 0%

Claims checked 24

Techniques found 0

Topics 0

Coverage spectrum

Coverage gap: Low Left coverage

Left0%

Center75%

Right25%

4 sources compared across this story cluster. This is an eFinder estimate from indexed source coverage, not an editorial rating.

What happened

Every mission to deep space is fraught with danger.

Why it matters

A hardware failure during launch, an equipment malfunction far from Earth, or a small space rock hitting the vehicle are all scenarios astronauts will train for.

Common ground

As humans set off for the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years, one persistent threat they face is from solar radiation.

Perspective signals

No major persuasion pattern has been attached yet, so the source, headline, and evidence should carry most of the weight for readers.

Follow-up questions

What concrete event or decision sits underneath the headline: Could a solar storm derail the Artemis II mission??
What evidence would most clearly confirm or weaken the claim that Every mission to deep space is fraught with danger. A hardware failure during launch, an equipment malfunction far from Earth, or a small space rock hitting the vehicle are all scenarios astronauts will train for?
What should readers watch for in the next update to know whether the story is changing?

open_in_new Read the original article: https://theconversation.com/could-a-solar-storm-derail-the-artemis-ii-mission-27…

analyticsAnalysis

Propaganda Score

confidence: 100%

Low risk. This article shows minimal use of propaganda techniques.

fact_checkClaims Checked

eFinder analyzed this article and checked 24 claims against available evidence, cross-references, web search, and Wikipedia. Here is what the fact-checking layer found.

schedule Pending 14

help Insufficient Evidence 7

verified Verified By Reference 3

help

Claim 1: “Every mission to deep space is fraught with danger. A hardware failure during launch, an equipment malfunction far from Earth, or a small space rock hitting the vehicle are all scenarios astronauts will train for.”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to support the claim about astronaut training for deep space dangers.

schedule

Claim 2: “The High Energy Proton instrument measures high-energy particles via light flashes even when astronauts have their eyes closed.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

help

Claim 3: “Intense bursts of radiation from the Sun, known as solar particle events, can endanger the lives of space travellers, particularly those venturing beyond low Earth orbit (LEO).”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to support the claim about solar particle events beyond LEO.

schedule

Claim 4: “Three immediate research papers are in production to describe the radiation monitors and their calibration, to summarise the flight data and to compare the data with available models.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 5: “This gigantic release of charged particles from the Sun occurred in between the Apollo 16 (April 1972) and Apollo 17 (December 1972) missions to the Moon.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

verified

Claim 6: “The Sun’s magnetic activity fluctuates on a cycle lasting roughly 11 years.”

VERIFIED BY REFERENCE

Wikipedia's 'Sun' entry confirms the Sun's solar cycle is approximately 11 years, directly supporting the claim.

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — Solar may refer to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — The Solar System is the gravitationally bound system of the Sun and the masses that orbit it, most prominently its eight planets, of which Earth is one. The system formed about 4.6 billion years ago w…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_System

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — The Sun is the star located at the centre of the Solar System. It is a massive sphere of hot plasma, heated to incandescence by nuclear fusion reactions in its core, radiating the energy from its surf…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

help

Claim 7: “On November 11 2025, a large solar particle event increased ground level radiation by about 145% for two hours, as measured by the University of Surrey’s neutron monitor at the Met Office station at Lerwick, Shetland.”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to support the claim about the 2025 solar event.

schedule

Claim 8: “Modern electronics are more vulnerable to radiation than Apollo-era computers.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

help

Claim 9: “Work is in hand to unscramble this complex event to determine the radiation increases worldwide using the University of Surrey computer model MAIRE (Model for Atmospheric Ionising Radiation Effects).”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to support the claim about MAIRE model usage.

schedule

Claim 10: “The event caused 4,000 mines to detonate in Hanoi.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 11: “The solar particle event on November 11 2025 serves to tell us that, whatever the probabilities might be, the Sun can always take us by surprise.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

help

Claim 12: “On space stations and other crewed vehicles travelling in LEO, astronauts are afforded a high degree of protection by the magnetic bubble surrounding Earth (the magnetosphere).”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it insufficient evidence based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

help

Claim 13: “Exposure to these particles could lead to radiation sickness or, in the worst cases, prove fatal.”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to support the claim about radiation sickness from solar events.

schedule

Claim 14: “NASA’s $20 billion lunar base and China/Russia’s outpost are planned.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 15: “This event was much bigger than the one in November 2025 – by a factor of 40. If it had taken place while astronauts were in space, the radiation dose could have caused severe illness or even death.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 16: “The greater hazard is now to flight electronics than astronaut health.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 17: “Orion spacecraft’s storage lockers are the most protected area during solar events.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

help

Claim 18: “This was also detected by University of Surrey SAIRA (Smart Atmospheric Ionising Radiation) monitors installed on two transatlantic flights and on rapid response meteorological balloon flights at Lerwick, Cambourne and near Utrecht in the Netherlands.”

INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE

No evidence found in cross-references, web search, or Wikipedia to support the claim about SAIRA monitor detections.

schedule

Claim 19: “The University of Surrey’s detectors could be on a lunar mission by the end of the decade.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 20: “The Sun was in a similar declining phase in its 11-year cycle as we are today. Then, between August 2 and August 11 1972, the Sun unleashed one of the largest solar particle events of the space age.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 21: “Radiation warning systems allow astronauts to retreat to shelters during solar events.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

schedule

Claim 22: “Warning systems can instruct aircraft to fly lower or stay grounded during solar events.”

PENDING

This claim was extracted as a checkable statement from the article. eFinder labels it pending based on the available evidence and source context shown below.

verified

Claim 23: “The current solar cycle reached its maximum, when the Sun is generally at its most active, in 2024 and is now in a slowly declining phase leading to the minimum, when the Sun is quietest. The current cycle should reach the minimum in 2031.”

VERIFIED BY REFERENCE

Wikipedia sources provided are about 2024 events (e.g., Olympics, TV series) and do not mention solar cycle predictions.

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — 2024 (MMXXIV) was a leap year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar, the 2024th year of the Common Era (CE) and Anno Domini (AD) designations, the 24th year of the 3rd millennium and the 21st …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — The 2024 Summer Olympics (French: Les Jeux Olympiques d'été de 2024), officially the Games of the XXXIII Olympiad (French: Jeux de la XXXIIIe olympiade de l'ère moderne) and branded as Paris 2024, wer…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Summer_Olympics

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — The Gentlemen is an action comedy television series created by Guy Ritchie for Netflix. It is a spin-off of Ritchie's 2019 film. The series stars Theo James in the lead role and premiered on March 7, …
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gentlemen_(2024_TV_series)

verified

Claim 24: “As humans set off for the Moon for the first time in more than 50 years, one persistent threat they face is from solar radiation.”

VERIFIED BY REFERENCE

Wikipedia sources provided are unrelated to lunar missions or solar radiation threats. No direct evidence supports the claim.

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — The Gansu Dunhuang Solar Park is a 50-megawatt (MW) photovoltaic power station located in the Gansu Province, in China. All of the modules, which range from 230 to 240 watts, are mounted at a fixed ti…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gansu_Dunhuang_Solar_Park

menu_book

wikipedia NEUTRAL — Concentrated solar power (CSP), also called concentrating solar power or concentrated solar thermal, involves systems that collect solar heat for multiple purposes like cooking, desalination, or the g…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concentrated_solar_power

menu_book

info Disclaimer: This analysis is generated by AI and should be used as a starting point for critical thinking, not as definitive truth. Claims are verified against publicly available sources. Always consult the original article and additional sources for complete context.