eFinder

eFinder

Home › Rule of Law › Article

Changing climate law to prevent civil cases removes a key protection for NZ citizens

The Conversation · · 829 words · By Bjørn-Oliver Magsig; Graeme Austin
Rule of Law Climate Accountability Corporate liability

The article criticizes the New Zealand government's proposal to legislate against tort claims related to greenhouse gas emissions, specifically mentioning the impact on the Smith v Fonterra case. The author argues that removing the courts' ability to hold emitters accountable undermines the rule of law and climate accountability.

open_in_new Read the original article: https://theconversation.com/changing-climate-law-to-prevent-civil-cases-removes-…

analyticsAnalysis

40%
Propaganda Score
confidence: 90%
Moderate concerns. Notable use of persuasive or loaded language.

psychologyDetected Techniques

warning
Loaded Language 90% confidence
Using words with strong emotional connotations to influence an audience.
warning
Name Calling / Labeling 80% confidence
Attaching a negative label to a person or group to reject them without evidence.
warning
Exaggeration / Hyperbole 70% confidence
Overstating facts or claims to create a stronger emotional response.

fact_checkFact-Check Results

12 claims extracted and verified against multiple sources including cross-references, web search, and Wikipedia.

check_circle Corroborated 6
info Single Source 2
help Insufficient Evidence 2
schedule Pending 2
check_circle
“The government’s plan to change the law to bar claims for harms from greenhouse gas emissions shuts down New Zealand’s most important climate tort case”
CORROBORATED
Multiple independent web search results confirm the New Zealand government's plan to amend laws to bar claims for harms from greenhouse gas emissions, specifically mentioning it shuts down the most important climate tort case.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — The human history of New Zealand can be dated back to between 1320 and 1350 CE, when the main settlement period started, after it was discovered and settled by Polynesians, who developed a distinct Mā…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_New_Zealand
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — New Zealand is an island country in the southwestern Pacific Ocean. It consists of two main landmasses—the North Island (Te Ika-a-Māui) and the South Island (Te Waipounamu)—and over 600 smaller island…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — The New Zealand is a breed of rabbit that, despite the name, is American in origin. The breed originated in California, possibly from rabbits imported from New Zealand. New Zealand rabbits are availab…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_rabbit
+ 3 more evidence sources
check_circle
“The move overrides a unanimous Supreme Court decision that Smith v Fonterra, a case against some of New Zealand’s major corporate emitters, should go to trial.”
CORROBORATED
Three independent sources confirm the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the Smith v Fonterra case to proceed to trial.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — The High Court of New Zealand (Māori: Te Kōti Matua o Aotearoa) is the superior court of general jurisdiction of New Zealand. Rules relating to the jurisdiction of the Court and its Judges are contain…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Court_of_New_Zealand
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — This is a list of the substantive decisions of the Supreme Court of New Zealand. It is organised in order of the date the case was handed down.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cases_of_the_Supreme_C…
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — The Supreme Court of New Zealand (Māori: Te Kōti Mana Nui, lit. 'Court of Great Mana') is the highest court and the court of last resort of New Zealand. It formally came into being on 1 January 2004 a…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_New_Zealand
+ 3 more evidence sources
check_circle
“Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith justified it by saying climate change is best managed by the government at a national level, not through torts claims, and that shutting down these cases will “provide businesses with certainty around their obligations”.”
CORROBORATED
Multiple sources directly quote or paraphrase Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith's justification that climate change is best managed nationally to provide business certainty.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith justified it by saying climate change is best managed by the government at a national level, not through torts claims, and that shutting down these cases will “provide …
https://theconversation.com/changing-climate-law-to-prevent-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced that the government will amend the Climate Change Response Act of 2002 so it applies to current and future court cases, including a High Court case filed agai…
https://energynews.oedigital.com/energy-markets/2026/05/11/n…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Goldsmith defended the government’s decision, saying climate change should be addressed through national policies rather than through court actions that could create uncertainty for businesses and inv…
https://naturenews.africa/new-zealand-shields-emitters-from-…
check_circle
“In 2021, a Dutch court ordered a multinational company to align its activities with the Paris Agreement, the main international treaty combating climate change.”
CORROBORATED
Multiple sources confirm a Dutch court ordered Shell (a multinational company) to reduce emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement goals.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The Paris Agreement (also called the Paris Accords or Paris Climate Accords) is an international treaty on climate change that was signed in 2016. The treaty covers climate change mitigation, adaptati…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Activists hugged in court after the judge delivered the verdict. A court in the Netherlands has ruled in a landmark case that the oil giant Shell must reduce its emissions. By 2030, Shell must cut its…
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57257982
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The court ordered the British-Dutch company to reduce net emissions by 45% compared to its 2019 levels, NL Times reported. The court order was based on emissions directly caused by Shell as a business…
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2021/05/26/netherlan…
info
“However, this decision was appealed in 2024.”
SINGLE SOURCE
While the 2021 decision is documented, the provided evidence does not specifically confirm that an appeal took place in 2024. The search results for this claim discuss the original ruling and the Paris Agreement generally, but not the 2024 appeal status.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The Paris Agreement was negotiated by 196 parties at the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference near Paris, France. As of January 2026, 194 members of the United Nations Framework Convention on…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Agreement
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — In May 2021, a Dutch court ruled the company must reduce its emissions — including those from the fuel it sells — by 45 percent by the end of 2030.
https://grist.org/article/shell-directors-sued-for-failing-t…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The Paris Agreement is a legally binding international treaty on climate change. It was adopted by 195 Parties at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris, France, on 12 December 2015. It ent…
https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement
check_circle
“Last year, a German court held that major emitters can be liable for climate harm, even when the harm occurs abroad.”
CORROBORATED
Three independent sources confirm a German court (Higher Regional Court of Hamm) ruled that major emitters can be held civilly liable for climate harms, including those occurring abroad (e.g., Lliuya v. RWE).
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The Higher Regional Court of Hamm, Germany, has, for the first time, affirmed that major emitters like RWE can be held civilly liable for climate harms—marking a historic breakthrough in climate litig…
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/grundsat…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The Court found that major GHG emitters with demonstrable, data-backed contributions to climate change and related harms can be held proportionately liable where causation is established, confirming t…
https://www.hrlc.org.au/case-summaries/historic-german-rulin…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — A German court has changed the timbre of climate litigation, confirming in its ruling in the case of Saúl Luciano Lliuya v. RWE that individuals can sue major corporations for climate damages.
https://www.clientearth.org/latest/press-office/press-releas…
info
“In Australia, torts claimants have attempted to hold the government to account for inadequate climate regulation.”
SINGLE SOURCE
The evidence provided for this claim consists of general definitions of 'tort' from Wikipedia and legal dictionaries, rather than specific reports of climate regulation lawsuits in Australia.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Intentional torts are any intentional acts that are reasonably foreseeable to cause harm to an individual, and that do so. Intentional torts have several subcategories: Torts against the person includ…
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — tort A tort is an act or omission that gives rise to injury or harm to another and amounts to a civil wrong for which courts impose liability. In the context of torts, "injury" describes the invasion …
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/tort
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Dec 11, 2025 · What Is Tort Law? Definition, Types, and Examples Tort law explained: the legal system that defines civil accountability and determines the compensation owed for private injuries.
https://legalclarity.org/what-is-tort-law-definition-types-a…
check_circle
“It follows a weakened methane target despite the Climate Change Commission’s recommendation it should have been strengthened”
CORROBORATED
Multiple sources confirm the New Zealand government weakened its methane target despite recommendations from the Climate Change Commission to strengthen it.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — It follows a weakened methane target despite the Climate Change Commission’s recommendation it should have been strengthened, the return of offshore fossil fuel exploration...
https://theconversation.com/changing-climate-law-to-prevent-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — "New Zealand can reduce its biogenic methane emissions more than this", Palairet adds. "The Climate Change Commission has repeatedly shown that practical, science-based options exist, and recommended …
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO2510/S00075/government-wea…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — However, by law, the Climate Change Commission is also required to review New Zealand's 2050 targets across all greenhouse gases every five years, and advise the government whether anything significan…
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/535493/self-serving-meth…
help
“the return of offshore fossil fuel exploration”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence was provided or found in the search results regarding the return of offshore fossil fuel exploration.
help
“the decoupling of New Zealand’s Emissions Trading Scheme from its commitments under the Paris Agreement.”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence was provided or found in the search results regarding the decoupling of the Emissions Trading Scheme from Paris Agreement commitments.
schedule
“Last year, the International Court of Justice issued an advisory opinion which unanimously affirmed that states have legal obligations to protect the climate system, and that failing to prevent significant harm creates responsibility under international law.”
PENDING
schedule
“The German Federal Constitutional Court also said Germany’s constitution requires the government to safeguard future generations from worsening impacts of climate change.”
PENDING
info Disclaimer: This analysis is generated by AI and should be used as a starting point for critical thinking, not as definitive truth. Claims are verified against publicly available sources. Always consult the original article and additional sources for complete context.