fullscreen

eFinder

eFinder

Home › Gender-Based Online Violence › Article

Australia wants social media to be ‘safe by design’. What does that actually look like?

The Conversation · 🇦🇺 public Australia · · 917 words · By Anastasia Powell; Dana McKay; Madhuka Thisuri De Silva; Senuri Wijenayake
Gender-Based Online Violence Platform Accountability Digital Safety Regulation
headphones Listen to the eFinder podcast briefing
Ready to play
Daily briefing

What to know about Gender-Based Online Violence

The article discusses a proposed Australian federal government 'digital duty of care' for social media platforms to prevent online harm. It presents six recommendations based on research with women and gender-diverse Australians to ensure 'safe by design' principles are practically implemented.

Propaganda risk 20%
Claims checked 9
Techniques found 2
Topics 3

Coverage spectrum

Coverage gap: Low Left coverage
Left0%
Center100%
Right0%

3 sources compared across this story cluster. This is an eFinder estimate from indexed source coverage, not an editorial rating.

What happened

Australia is world-leading in taking active measures to keep people safe online – home to the world’s first dedicated online safety regulator, the eSafety Commissioner, and the first country to introduce enforceable industry codes requiring platforms to…

Why it matters

And now, a newly released federal government issues paper proposes a “digital duty of care”, which would require social media platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable online harm.

Common ground

The proposal signals Australia’s position that it is platforms, not just individuals, who should be responsible for actively preventing online harms.

Perspective signals

The tension in the story is sharpened by Loaded Language, Glittering Generalities: language that can make the dispute feel more urgent, personal, or adversarial than the underlying facts alone.

The article discusses a proposed Australian federal government 'digital duty of care' for social media platforms to prevent online harm. It presents six recommendations based on research with women and gender-diverse Australians to ensure 'safe by design' principles are practically implemented.

open_in_new Read the original article: https://theconversation.com/australia-wants-social-media-to-be-safe-by-design-wh…

analyticsAnalysis

20%
Propaganda Score
confidence: 90%
Minor concerns. Some persuasive language detected, but largely factual.

psychologyPropaganda Techniques Detected

eFinder identified 2 propaganda techniques in this article. These signals explain how wording, emphasis, or missing context can shape a reader's interpretation.

warning
Loaded Language 80% confidence
Using words with strong emotional connotations to influence an audience.
Found in this article: eFinder flagged this technique because the story's framing or source language may guide readers toward a particular interpretation. Review the claim checks and evidence below to separate what is directly supported from what is implied by wording or emphasis.
Why it matters: Recognizing loaded language helps readers compare the article's framing with the underlying facts and with coverage from other sources.
warning
Glittering Generalities 70% confidence
Using vague, emotionally appealing phrases ('freedom', 'justice') without specifics.
Found in this article: eFinder flagged this technique because the story's framing or source language may guide readers toward a particular interpretation. Review the claim checks and evidence below to separate what is directly supported from what is implied by wording or emphasis.
Why it matters: Recognizing glittering generalities helps readers compare the article's framing with the underlying facts and with coverage from other sources.

fact_checkClaims Checked

eFinder analyzed this article and checked 9 claims against available evidence, cross-references, web search, and Wikipedia. Here is what the fact-checking layer found.

info Single Source 5
verified Verified By Reference 2
help Insufficient Evidence 1
check_circle Corroborated 1
info
Claim 1: “Australia’s proposal suggests platforms should prevent the upload of seriously harmful content such as image-based abuse, or detect and remove it”
SINGLE SOURCE
The evidence provided for this claim consists of irrelevant information about Australian mammal extinction and tourism, with no mention of the digital duty of care or image-based abuse.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Over the past two centuries, Australia has lost more mammal species than any other continent. Overall, 100 Australian species are listed as extinct or extinct in the wild. In June 2021, over 1,000 ani…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Read the latest Australian and world news, expert political commentary, business analysis, and breaking investigative journalism from The Australian.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Discover Australia's sparkling beaches, friendly wildlife and natural wonders. There's never been a better time to travel to Australia, so come and say g'day!
https://www.australia.com/en-us
info
Claim 2: “The digital duty of care flags that anonymous account systems may need redesigning to prevent foreseeable harm”
SINGLE SOURCE
One specific source explicitly states that the digital duty of care flags that anonymous account systems may need redesigning to prevent foreseeable harm.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Jun 7, 2026 ... ... proposed digital duty of care ... The digital duty of care flags that anonymous account systems may need redesigning to prevent foreseeable harm.
https://theconversation.com/australia-wants-social-media-to-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Jun 8, 2026 ... The proposal signals Australia's position that it is platforms, not just individuals, who should be responsible for actively preventing online ...
https://www.interest.co.nz/technology/138885/australia-wants…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Dec 4, 2020 ... circumstances may require considerable support to avoid harm. This suggests that vulnerability should not be seen exclusively as the product ...
https://www.oaic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/11136/Re…
verified
Claim 3: “platforms should have accessible complaint mechanisms and respond within 24 hours for serious issues [under the digital duty of care proposal]”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
While evidence confirms the existence of the 'digital duty of care' proposal, none of the provided sources specifically mention a '24 hour' response requirement for serious issues.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — The 2023–24 Australian bushfire season was the summer season of bushfires in Australia. The spring and summer outlook for the season prediction was for increased risk of fire for regions in Queensland…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2023–24_Australian_bushfire_se…
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — 24 is an American action thriller television series created by Joel Surnow and Robert Cochran for Fox. The series features an ensemble cast, with Kiefer Sutherland starring as American counter-terrori…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24_(TV_series)
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is a country comprising the mainland of the Australian continent, the island of Tasmania and numerous smaller islands. It has a land area of 7,688,…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia
+ 3 more evidence sources
info
Claim 4: “the first country to introduce enforceable industry codes requiring platforms to tackle harmful content at scale”
SINGLE SOURCE
One source mentions the Online Safety Act requires binding industry codes, but other sources provided are vague or discuss the 'duty of care' proposal rather than confirming Australia was the 'first country' to introduce enforceable codes at scale.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The proposal signals Australia’s position that it is platforms, not just individuals, who should be responsible for actively preventing online harms. At the heart of the proposed digital duty of care …
https://theconversation.com/australia-wants-social-media-to-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — first country to approve.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Since the Code is non-enforceable, compliance relies on the platforms’ willingness to adopt measures.First, the Online Safety Act (Cth) requires large social media platforms to be subject to binding i…
https://static1.squarespace.com/static/577228a5e4fcb512c064f…
info
Claim 5: “the proposed duty of care requires [effective content moderation systems pairing automated detection with human moderators trained in cultural nuances]”
SINGLE SOURCE
One source explicitly links the proposed duty of care to the requirement of pairing automated detection with human moderators trained in cultural nuances.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The users in our research recommended pairing automated detection with human moderators trained in cultural nuances, which is precisely the kind of effective content moderation system the proposed dut…
https://theconversation.com/australia-wants-social-media-to-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — A digital duty of care is sometimes referred to as “safety by design”. It will require social media platforms to establish risk management systems. They must identify potential risks from their servic…
https://findanexpert.unimelb.edu.au/news/154531-if-we-force-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — While automated moderation systems are essential for managing the vast scale of user generated content, human moderators remain a critical part of the moderation process.
https://detector24.ai/insights/ai-video-moderation-explained…
help
Claim 6: “The duty of care proposal requires platforms to mitigate reasonably foreseeable harms – which means looking beyond individual incidents”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
No evidence was provided for this claim.
verified
Claim 7: “One in two Australian adults have experienced online abuse in their lifetime”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
The evidence provided includes general statistics on worldwide trauma and mentions of online abuse, but does not provide the specific statistic that 'one in two Australian adults' have experienced online abuse.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is a country comprising the mainland of the Australian continent, the island of Tasmania and numerous smaller islands. It has a land area of 7,688,…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Australian(s) may refer to:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Australians, colloquially known as Aussies, are the citizens, nationals and individuals associated with the country of Australia. This connection may be residential, legal, historical or ethno-cultura…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australians
+ 3 more evidence sources
info
Claim 8: “Australia... [is] home to the world’s first dedicated online safety regulator, the eSafety Commissioner”
SINGLE SOURCE
The provided evidence for this claim consists of general Wikipedia entries about Australia's geography and states, with no mention of the eSafety Commissioner.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Australia, officially the Commonwealth of Australia, is a country comprising the mainland of the Australian continent, the island of Tasmania and numerous smaller islands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australia
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Australia has six federated states: New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria, and Western Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_and_territories_of_Aust…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Jan 16, 2024 · Australia (officially, the Commonwealth of Australia) is divided into 6 states and 2 major mainland territories. In alphabetical order, the states are: New South Wales, Queensland, Sout…
https://www.worldatlas.com/maps/australia
check_circle
Claim 9: “a newly released federal government issues paper proposes a “digital duty of care”, which would require social media platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable online harm”
CORROBORATED
Multiple independent web search results confirm that the Australian federal government has released an issues paper proposing a 'digital duty of care' to prevent foreseeable online harm.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — And now, a newly released federal government issues paper proposes a “digital duty of care”, which would require social media platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable online harm. The…
https://theconversation.com/australia-wants-social-media-to-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The government is currently consulting on an issues paper to introduce a digital duty of care that would legally require online platforms to prevent foreseeable harm to Australians. The proposal is ai…
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-06-25/australia-will-streng…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — The Government has committed to legislating a Digital Duty of Care that would require online services to take reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable harms experienced by Australians.
https://www.admscentre.org.au/digital-duty-of-care-for-onlin…
info Disclaimer: This analysis is generated by AI and should be used as a starting point for critical thinking, not as definitive truth. Claims are verified against publicly available sources. Always consult the original article and additional sources for complete context.