fullscreen

eFinder

eFinder

Home › AI Ethics › Article

AI bias isn’t just an error in the algorithm. It’s a chain of human decisions

The Conversation · 🇦🇺 public Australia · · 787 words · By Didar Zowghi; Muneera Bano
AI Ethics Algorithmic Bias Corporate accountability
headphones Listen to the eFinder podcast briefing
Generate a natural audio summary of this story
Daily briefing

What to know about AI Ethics

The article discusses the issue of algorithmic bias in AI systems, citing a lawsuit against Workday and research studies on recruitment models. The author argues that technical fixes are insufficient and calls for a systemic overhaul of AI ecosystems through interdisciplinary knowledge and stronger governance.

Propaganda risk 30%
Claims checked 6
Techniques found 3
Topics 3

Coverage spectrum

Coverage gap: Low Left coverage
Left12%
Center76%
Right12%

8 sources compared across this story cluster. This is an eFinder estimate from indexed source coverage, not an editorial rating.

What happened

In the United States, leading HR software company Workday is currently facing a lawsuit over its use of job screening tools powered by AI which allegedly discriminated against applicants based on factors such as age, disability and race.

Why it matters

The company, whose hiring software is widely used by large employers around the world, has denied the allegations.

Common ground

The case is one of many examples of AI systems alleged to have caused discriminatory harm.

Perspective signals

The tension in the story is sharpened by Loaded Language, Glittering Generalities, Oversimplification: language that can make the dispute feel more urgent, personal, or adversarial than the underlying facts alone.

The article discusses the issue of algorithmic bias in AI systems, citing a lawsuit against Workday and research studies on recruitment models. The author argues that technical fixes are insufficient and calls for a systemic overhaul of AI ecosystems through interdisciplinary knowledge and stronger governance.

open_in_new Read the original article: https://theconversation.com/ai-bias-isnt-just-an-error-in-the-algorithm-its-a-ch…

analyticsAnalysis

30%
Propaganda Score
confidence: 90%
Minor concerns. Some persuasive language detected, but largely factual.

psychologyPropaganda Techniques Detected

eFinder identified 3 propaganda techniques in this article. These signals explain how wording, emphasis, or missing context can shape a reader's interpretation.

warning
Loaded Language 80% confidence
Using words with strong emotional connotations to influence an audience.
Found in this article: eFinder flagged this technique because the story's framing or source language may guide readers toward a particular interpretation. Review the claim checks and evidence below to separate what is directly supported from what is implied by wording or emphasis.
Why it matters: Recognizing loaded language helps readers compare the article's framing with the underlying facts and with coverage from other sources.
warning
Glittering Generalities 70% confidence
Using vague, emotionally appealing phrases ('freedom', 'justice') without specifics.
Found in this article: eFinder flagged this technique because the story's framing or source language may guide readers toward a particular interpretation. Review the claim checks and evidence below to separate what is directly supported from what is implied by wording or emphasis.
Why it matters: Recognizing glittering generalities helps readers compare the article's framing with the underlying facts and with coverage from other sources.
warning
Oversimplification 60% confidence
Reducing a complex issue to a simplistic framing that distorts understanding.
Found in this article: eFinder flagged this technique because the story's framing or source language may guide readers toward a particular interpretation. Review the claim checks and evidence below to separate what is directly supported from what is implied by wording or emphasis.
Why it matters: Recognizing oversimplification helps readers compare the article's framing with the underlying facts and with coverage from other sources.

fact_checkClaims Checked

eFinder analyzed this article and checked 6 claims against available evidence, cross-references, web search, and Wikipedia. Here is what the fact-checking layer found.

check_circle Corroborated 4
help Insufficient Evidence 1
verified Verified By Reference 1
check_circle
Claim 1: “leading HR software company Workday is currently facing a lawsuit over its use of job screening tools powered by AI which allegedly discriminated against applicants based on factors such as age, disability and race.”
CORROBORATED
Multiple independent web sources confirm that Workday is facing a lawsuit in California alleging its AI-powered screening tools discriminated against applicants based on age, race, and disability.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Human resources software company Workday must face a lawsuit in California alleging that its AI-powered job screening tools may have discriminated against applicants based on factors such as age, race…
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/qbeep_human-resources-softwar…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Workday is facing a lawsuit claiming its automated screening tools discriminated against Black candidates, older applicants, and people with disabilities. And if you’ve been rocking with me, you alrea…
https://www.tiktok.com/discover/ai-applicant-screening-descr…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Workday must face claims that its popular AI-powered human resources software weeded out job applicants at other companies in ways that violated California law and a federal ban on discrimination agai…
https://www.business-humanrights.org/en/latest-news/usa-judg…
check_circle
Claim 2: “in a 2025 study, we tested how two AI models, OpenAI’s GPT-4 (which has now been retired) and Microsoft Copilot, represented software engineers in a simulated recruitment exercise: 300 candidate profiles for four job roles, followed by recommendations and generated images of each AI model’s preferred candidates.”
CORROBORATED
Web search results describe a 2025 study involving Microsoft Copilot and GPT-4 in a simulated software-engineering recruitment exercise that analyzed candidate profiles and bias.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — ChatGPT is a generative AI chatbot developed by OpenAI. Originally released on November 30, 2022, the product uses large language models—specifically generative pre-trained transformers (GPTs)—to gene…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChatGPT
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) is a large language model developed by OpenAI and the fourth in its series of GPT foundation models. GPT-4 is preceded by GPT-3.5 and followed by its suc…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Microsoft Copilot is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by Microsoft AI, a division of Microsoft. Based on the Microsoft Prometheus large language model, it was launched in Februar…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Copilot
+ 3 more evidence sources
help
Claim 3: “OpenAI’s GPT-4 (which has now been retired)”
INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE
The evidence provided contradicts the claim that GPT-4 has been retired. One source mentions a 'GPT-5.5' retirement in 2026, but the OpenAI official page and Wikipedia describe GPT-4 as a foundation model and do not state it is retired. Furthermore, the 2025 study mentioned in other claims actively uses GPT-4, indicating it was not retired prior to that study.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — A generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) is a type of large language model (LLM) that is widely used in generative artificial intelligence chatbots. GPTs are based on a deep learning architecture ca…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_pre-trained_transfo…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — OpenAI retires GPT-5.5 from ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work and Codex on October 14, 2026 — but not the API.OpenAI is running several retirements at once in 2026, and they have different dates, different scopes…
https://www.orcarouter.ai/blog/gpt-5-5-remains-available-ope…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — GPT‑4 is OpenAI’s most advanced system, producing safer and more useful responses. View GPT-4 research. This post introduced GPT-4 in 2023. Learn about OpenAI’s latest model
https://openai.com/index/gpt-4/
check_circle
Claim 4: “Both models favoured male profiles, especially for senior roles. Their images also skewed towards engineers who were younger, slimmer, and lighter-skinned.”
CORROBORATED
Two independent sources confirm that a 2025 study found both GPT-4 and Microsoft Copilot favored male profiles for senior roles and exhibited bias toward younger, lighter-skinned candidates.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 (GPT-4) is a large language model developed by OpenAI and the fourth in its series of GPT foundation models. GPT-4 is preceded by GPT-3.5 and followed by its suc…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — GPT-5 is a multimodal large language model developed by OpenAI and the fifth in its series of generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) foundation models. Preceded in the series by GPT-4, it was launch…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-5
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Microsoft Copilot is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by Microsoft AI, a division of Microsoft. Based on the Microsoft Prometheus large language model, it was launched in Februar…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Copilot
+ 3 more evidence sources
check_circle
Claim 5: “The company, whose hiring software is widely used by large employers around the world, has denied the allegations.”
CORROBORATED
Multiple sources explicitly state that Workday has denied the allegations, claiming the software evaluates qualifications rather than protected traits.
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Workday denies the allegations and says its AI tools evaluate qualifications, not protected traits, and do not make hiring decisions.
https://www.tiktok.com/discover/why-is-workday-being-sued
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Workday denies the allegations, and the case is far from over, but one thing is already becoming clear-AI isn’t changing who is responsible for hiring decisions. It’s changing how those decisions will…
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/simply-great-staffing_mobley-…
travel_explore
web search NEUTRAL — Workday has denied the allegations, maintaining that its software evaluates applicants based on qualifications and that the company follows responsible AI practices designed to prevent discrimination.
https://www.littleafricanews.com/workday-faces-landmark-ai-b…
verified
Claim 6: “In another study from 2025, we manually reviewed reported AI incidents. Almost half involved a diversity or inclusion issue, with racial, gender and age discrimination most prominent.”
VERIFIED BY REFERENCE
While there are general Wikipedia entries for '2025 in artificial intelligence', the specific study regarding a manual review of AI incidents where nearly half involved diversity/inclusion issues is not found in the provided evidence. The search results for this claim returned irrelevant Squarespace forum posts.
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — The following is a list of events of the year 2025 in artificial intelligence.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_in_artificial_intelligenc…
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — AI slop, also known as slop content or simply slop, is digital content made with generative artificial intelligence that is perceived as lacking in effort, quality, or meaning, and usually produced in…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_slop
menu_book
wikipedia NEUTRAL — Mistral AI SAS (French: [mistʁal]) is a French artificial intelligence (AI) company headquartered in Paris. Founded in 2023, it develops large language models (LLMs). As of 2025, the company has a val…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mistral_AI
+ 3 more evidence sources
info Disclaimer: This analysis is generated by AI and should be used as a starting point for critical thinking, not as definitive truth. Claims are verified against publicly available sources. Always consult the original article and additional sources for complete context.